Articles

Theme

Members of BRAL (groups/associations)​ (01/2020)

  • Beursschouwburg (Tom Bonte)
  • Beweging B-H-V 
  • Brukselbinnenstebuiten vzw (Anne Brumagne en Bert De Bisschop)
  • Brussel Natuur vzw (Ninanne Mario)
  • Buurthuis Bonnevie vzw (Lieven Monserez)
  • Buurtwinkel Aneessens (Bart Van de Ven)
  • Corvia (Mathilde Pelsers)
  • Cycloperativa (Yanick d'Otreppe)
  • De Groene Wandeling Neder-Over-Heembeek vzw (Benoît Elleboudt)
  • Dewey asbl (Mathieu Simonson)
  • EUGC (Nijs Frans, Carolien Zandbergen)
  • Fietsersbond vzw - Brussel (Wies Callens )
  • G.A.Q. vzw – Brussel Noord-Oostwijk (Christian Dekeyser)
  • GEBOV/GUTIB (Bernard De Coster)
  • GC De Markten (Isolde Boutsen)
  • GRACQ (Willems Aurélie)
  • Maritiemcomité - Havenwijk (Rose-May Liebaert)
  • Natuurpunt vzw - Brussel (De Backer Toby)
  • Ploef! Indira Osumba
  • Transports Collectifs Net (Olivier Servais)
  • Vereniging Leopoldswijk en Europese wijk van Brussel vzw (Renée Coen)
  • Wijkcomité Neerpede blijft! (Johan Van Waeyenberge en Steven De Ridder)
  • Bauwens Ginette
  • Christiaens Etienne
  • De Corte Stef
  • De Raeve Luk
  • Deboosere Patrick
  • Demol Pierre
  • Eelens Hans
  • Goubau Nicolas
  • Goyens-Le Maire Christine
  • Hollander Sarah
  • Kaviani Cyriel
  • Laporta Philippe
  • Lootens Tom
  • Martens Albert
  • Muyldermans Laura
  • Pauly Raf
  • Schmelz Bertrand
  • Stiénon Fabien
  • Timmermans Thierry
  • Van Assche Anton
  • Van Den Houte Kriestien
  • Van der Smissen Gaëtan
  • Van Laethem Mathieu
  • Van Reusel Hanne
  • Van Steenberghe Jean-Pol
  • Vanhamme Georges
  • Vermeulen Sofie
  • Willems Gudrun

Bruxelles selon le BRAL

La structure (financière)

Le rôle du BRAL

BRAL a eu 40 ans en 2014

RED POSTER

[collapse collapsed]

What does the red poster look like? 

A red poster is a placard stating “notice of a public inquiry”. It includes all relevant data, in Dutch and in French in black letters on a red background.

The presentation of the poster is set down in law and can be found in the executive order about public inquiries and the special rules of disclosure. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Which data will be included on a red poster?

The poster is in two languages (French/Dutch) with always the same basic text as well as a number of additional data to be filled in by the commune, depending on the project. You will find the identity of the applicant, the address of the project, the reason for the public inquiry, start and closing date of the public inquiry, date and location for the meeting of the consultation committee, and also the location and hours for consulting the file.

The language used on a red poster is concise and schematic, using abbreviations and specific terminology. If you have questions, your commune (or Bral) could be of assistance.

Since July 2010, posters describing projects of a particular size also need to include a 3D image of the project and the surrounding buildings. However, the application of this order leaves much to be desired.

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Where and when will the red poster be put up?

A red poster will be put up at the address of the relevant property or plot of land and at a visible location in the town hall. For each application, at least 3 red posters are to be affixed around the relevant building plot or property: 1 on the actual address, and 1 on each street corner of the building block, in which the property or building plot is located. They are usually found at eye level on posts for traffic and road signs. 

The red posters need to be put up at least 48 hours before the beginning of the public inquiry and they need to remain visible and legible throughout the entire duration of the public inquiry. They are often laminated to ensure that they will remain legible. 

[/collapse collapsed]

PUBLIC INQUIRY

[collapse collapsed]

What is the duration of a public inquiry?

The duration of a public inquiry depends on the type of project and is always expressed in a number of calendar days.

According to the general rule, a public inquiry concerning town planning permits and certificates lasts for 15 calendar days. Therefore, that does not leave much time to study the file and to react. Longer terms are reserved for the more complex town planning plans and regulations. At any rate, at least half of the public inquiry should take place outside the summer-, Christmas- or Easter holidays.

  • Town planning permits and certificates: 15 days
  • Permits for the construction or modification of traffic routes: 30 days
  • Specifications for an impact study: 15 days
  • Town planning permit including an impact study: 30 days
  • Draft of a Particular Zoning Plan: 30 days
  • Proposal for expropriation: 30 days
  • Draft for a municipal or regional regulation: 30 days
  • Draft for a Municipal Development Plan (PCD/GemOP): 45 days
  • Draft for a Regional Development Plan (PRD/GewOP) and Regional Land Use Plan (PRAS/GBP): 60 days

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Which projects are submitted to a public inquiry?

The communes in Brussels organise a public inquiry into all the plans and projects described in What is the duration of a public inquiry.

For each town planning permit or certificate, the zone in which the project is located according to the Regional Land Use Plan (PRAS/GBP) is taken into consideration. Different provisions apply to each zone on the Regional Land Use Plan. A public inquiry will only be organised if those provisions provide for it, usually by means of exceptions. The size or the type of the project is therefore in itself no criterion for a public inquiry.

This is why the “reason for the inquiry” on the red posters is always stated in technical jargon and why they often refer to the Land Use Plans. You can find the rules of the Regional Land Use Plan via the following website (only in Dutch and French).

[The same website provides more useful legal information under ‘stedenbouwkundige vergunning or permis d’urbanisme.]

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

When does a public inquiry take place?

The communes organise the public inquiry for the projects on their territory. The timing for the inquiry has been laid down in the Brussels Town Planning Code (CoBAT/BWRO) and depends among other things on the complexity of the file.

It is an important rule of thumb that half of the term set aside for a public inquiry should fall outside the school holiday periods (summer-, Easter- and Christmas holidays). 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Which public inquiries are taken place at present in your commune?  

The websites of most of the communes contain a list of the current public inquiries. Ganshoren and Vorst/Forest are the exceptions. However, beware, also in the other communes the lists are not always up to date.

On the website of Stedenbouw.brussels / Urbanisme.brussels you find links to the current public inqueries of the different communes.

On our own website you will find our BRALSELECTION. This list contains our own subjective selection of public inquiries in all 19 communes in the Brussels-Capital Region, based on the following criteria:

  • Inquiries that are of more than purely local interest,
  • Inquiries that strike us for whatever reason or
  • Inquiries that we follow-up anyway in our daily operations. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

CONSULTATION OF FILES 

[collapse collapsed]

Where and when can you consult a file?

On the red poster you will find the contact data of the Town Planning Service of your commune and the opening hours of the service where you can consult the plans.

The file of a current public inquiry can be consulted at the Town Planning Service, and once a week this can be done outside normal office hours. For at least one half day each week, the ‘competent official’ can provide explanations. This is the person who is most familiar with the file and who is best placed to answer your questions.

If you wish further explanations, it is advisable to telephone the service prior to your visit to make an appointment with the relevant person. This is particularly recommended if you want to consult the file, during that one evening per week that the town hall is required to be open. Do not worry about asking ‘silly questions’. The provision of public services is the most important task of the local authorities, and the competent is official is there to help you. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Which documents will be found in a file?

The content of an application file for a town planning permit or a town planning certificate has been laid down in law and can be consulted on the following website: 

For local residents the most interesting documents in the file will be the following:

  • A copy of the red poster. This will give a concise summary of all the data relevant to the application.
  • A completed standard application form for a town planning permit or a town planning certificate. This application form contains among others: figure data, both about the existing situation as about the design: surface of the different intended uses of the various floors, occupancy rate, number of dwellings, housing density, etc.)
  • Some photographs of the existing situation of the property or building plot and its immediate environment.
  • A synthesis document in A-3 format with the most important plans: the layout plan, the vertical elevations, the cross-sections and the building profiles.
  • If necessary an impact report or impact study. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Which documents are you allowed to copy?

You should be able to obtain a copy of the following documents, see preceding paragraph for an explanation:

  • The red poster
  • The completed standard application form
  • The synthesis document
  • Previously issued permits or certificates with corresponding advice. A town planning permit or certificate that has been issued or refused is a public document, containing the opinion of the competent official, which in its turn restates the advice of the consultation committee.

Whether or not documents may be copied for free varies greatly from commune to commune. Some communes will not charge you, if you explain that you are acting on behalf of the local residents.

In general, the principle of freedom of information applies. The rules prescribe that you may apply for copies or extracts of documents both orally and in writing from the town council. If these documents are not handed over to you immediately, they will be ‘made available’ to you within 8 working days.

In practice, this means that you can pick up the requested documents in the town hall. In view of the fact, that most public inquiries last 15 calendar days (=11 working days), you can deduct from this that after a waiting period of 8 working days the public inquiry as well as your chance to react have often passed. Therefore, negotiate in order to obtain the documents immediately. Let us know  when you are dealing with an ‘awkward’ commune.

Unfortunately, it is not (yet) mandatory for the communes to provide digital copies of files submitted to a public inquiry, but you can always ask, just in case. 

[/collapse collapsed]

VOICE YOUR OPINION

[collapse collapsed]

How can you voice your opinion?

There are two moments when you may formulate objections and remarks:

During the duration of the public inquiry:

  • Orally: for at least one half day each week you may pass on your comments orally to the competent official. In many cases, this does not happen in an off-hand manner and you will need to request it specifically. In that case, the official will note down your remarks in a report that you will sign. Request a copy of this document. Sometimes, you will be able to indicate your remarks on a specifically formulated document. 
  • In writing: You may address your remarks in writing to the Council of Mayor and Aldermen before the end of the public inquiry. These remarks will then be included in the concluding minutes of the public inquiry. More and more frequently, you may send your remarks via e-mail. If that is the case it is mentioned on the red poster.

Please note: All remarks and objections that have been made both orally and in writing during the public inquiry need to be added to the concluding minutes of the public inquiry. Within 8 days after the end of the public inquiry, the Council of Mayor and Aldermen will write these minutes. The whole file together with a first analysis by the responsible official of the town hall will be transferred to all the members of the consultation committee.

During the meeting of the consultation committee:

If you want to explain your comments verbally, then you must address a written request at the Council of Mayor and Aldermen during the period of public review.

When you have requested to be present, you will be able to explain your remarks orally during the meeting of the consultation committee. You are allowed the assistance of two ‘advisors’. Anyone may be your advisor and residents, commuters or visitors know their neighbourhood best. There is certainly no need to consult a lawyer.

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

How do you request to be present to the consultation committee?

During the public inquiry, you may address a request in writing to the Council of Mayor and Aldermen to be present at the consultation committee. More and more often, this may also be done via e-mail, see the red poster. In that letter / e-mail you do not need to state the reasons why you wish to be heard. You do not need to declare an interest and you do not even have to be an inhabitant of the commune or the region. However, do make clear in your request that you want 'to be heard' by the consultation committee. You can elaborate orally on the arguments about the case in question during the meeting. It is recommended to send this letter in one of the two official languages, either Dutch or French.

According to the regulations, you will be ‘called’ to appear before the consultation committee at least 8 days before the meeting; usually this is done through the post, sometimes via e-mail. Sometimes the agenda of the consultation committee is published online on the website of the commune. If you have not received an invitation three days before the meeting, you are advised to make inquiries at the town planning service of your commune. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

What is the most efficient strategy?

We cannot propose a ready-made ‘most efficient strategy’. After all, the consultation committee does not have clear and objective criteria on which it must base its advice.

However, this should not be a cause for discouragement, but rather an incentive to experiment creatively with the possibilities listed below. We know of numerous successful experiences.

Technicians and politicians will take the definitive decision about a plan or project. A good balance between the points listed below will determine the impact on that decision:

1. The nature and strength of the arguments

All kinds of arguments are allowed: Legal-administrative, technical town-planning, socio-economic, emotional, symbolic, etc. The consultative committee does not question your arguments. Neither does it need to deal with each remark and objection separately and respond by either accepting them or by giving grounds for refuting them. 

Although all arguments are valuable, experience has taught us that arguments on legal grounds constitute a good basis. The authorities in Brussels all too often consider spatial planning from a legal point of view rather than from a global creative vision on the spatial needs, qualities and possibilities. Therefore, we recommend having a basic knowledge of the legal framework of the Brussels’ Town Planning.

2. The number of people that share a point of view

An individual reaction offers less scope to make an impact, unless you are an influential person or an eloquent speaker.

A collective reaction is more powerful. Try to collect many people and convince them of your point of view and arguments. You stand a better chance of influencing a plan or project, when you carefully prepare with as many partners as possible for the requirements of an intervention at the consultation committee.

Neighbourhood committee meetings offer the ideal opportunity to prepare those interventions. In the case of smaller projects on a local level, the influence of the residents on the advice of the consultation committee is generally quite considerable. The support of recognised interest groups, politicians, recognised experts etc. will underline the force of your demands.

3. dditional ways of lending support to objections

The options are a petition, a happening, a press release or a press conference, etc.

Try to use a full spectrum of actions. A petition with many signatures annexed to a letter has the value of one objection, but may exert a lot of political pressure. If the letter included with the petition states explicitly that all signatories to the petition request to be present at the consultation committee, then they will all be called upon. Sometimes, the number of people may the deciding factor, but ensure that everyone has something to contribute. A press action may influence public opinion and that may have repercussions on the political decision-making and the opinion of the members of the consultation committee.

4. The form of the objection in proportion to the nature and size of the project

As resident, commuter or visitor of the neighbourhood, you are best placed to judge whether a project is compatible with its environment. Do try to be reasonable, though, and take into account the context.

In the case of smaller projects limited to the neighbourhood, the influence of the residents on the advice of the consultation committee is generally fairly large. In the case of larger projects, in which public bodies and promoters often take the lead, the residents usually do not influence any positive or negative opinion. However, under the pressure of the remarks and objections, a revision of the project may be asked for or conditions may be imposed.

5. The way in which you explain your point of view

The best way of influencing the advice of the consultation committee, is by giving an oral representation of your remarks and objections during the meeting of the consultation committee. We have a clear impression that a written reaction on its own has less impact.

Here follow a few reminders.

Do not get caught out by being too negative in your reaction. Present a positive message and indicate the good projects in the neighbourhood as well. Make the necessary differentiations and remain constructive by making proposals for modifications, alternatives or different approaches.

See the bigger picture: do not act out of self-interest, but present points of view and arguments that are to everyone’s advantage, and that attest to a vision on the evolution in your neighbourhood.

Express your point of view and arguments clearly, but concisely. Quantity does not equal quality. Choose the right arguments purposefully and avoid referring to topics that are not relevant. 

The time available to the members of the consultation committee is limited; sometimes, they need to deal with up to 20 applications a day. Therefore, be prepared for their request not to repeat information, but at the same time do not allow yourself to be intimidated.

Pay sufficient attention to a well-structured conclusion. Compose a concise note with a few points, in order to finish your argument by summing up the main points.

Do you want to find out which strategies some groups of residents in Brussels have used to put pressure on the policy? Have a look at our leaflet link naar de brochure Ook jij maakt de stad!. / Participez à la Ville  

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Is it allowed to hand in written submissions during a consultation committee?

If the file at stake is complex, it can be useful to write down your points before the meeting, so as not to forget anything during your presentation. You can hand a copy of such notes to the meeting secretary, for the minutes. In the past we have seen cases where lawyers (as counsel to the initiators of the project) protest and object to such a procedure, but formally it is not forbidden. No-one from the authorities has taken a clear position on this matter so far.

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

CONSULTATION COMMITTEES 

[collapse collapsed]

What are the duties of a consultation committee?

The consultation committee gathers all advisory services with respect to a file together. The committee assesses the plan or project submitted to a public inquiry and then gives its opinion to the authority that will issue the permit. The opinion of the consultation committee may be in favour, in favour with conditions attached or against. The opinion is formally non-binding. In most cases, the permit issuing authority follows the opinion of the committee. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

What is the composition of the consultation committee?

The members of the consultation committee (10 in total) are representatives of the commune and the region:

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

How does the consultation committee arrive at an opinion?

It is the intention that the members of the consultation committee arrive at a consensus. If this is not possible, the minority points of view will also be included in the opinion.

Members, who represent an institution that has submitted an application, need to abstain. This means that they do not participate in the consultation or the vote.

The consultation committee usually decides its opinion immediately after the hearing, based on the personal analysis of the file by the members prior to the meeting and the remarks that they have heard during the hearing. In the case of important files, a member may have received specific instructions about his point of view from his superiors.

The major bottleneck is the complete absence of clear criteria, to which a member of the consultation committee may refer to give a specific opinion. There is no explicit guideline. The Regional Land Use Plan (PRAS / GBP)  provides some directives but these are very general in nature and open to interpretation. Until today, these rules have not been specified.

An opinion may be in favour, in favour with conditions attached or negative. Sometimes the consultation committee imposes conditions, which the revised plan/project needs to satisfy in order to be carried out. In that case, the applicant is offered the opportunity to modify his project according to those conditions. When ‘major modifications’ are required, a new public inquiry will be held; otherwise all that is required is a new opinion by the consultation committee. The consultation committee decides whether a new public inquiry is needed.

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Is the opinion of the consultation committee binding?

As a general rule the opinion of the consultation committee is not binding for the licensing authority.

But in some cases the opinion is a decisive element. 

The Council of Mayor and Aldermen can use the opinion of the consultation committee as a permit in its own right, when an impact assessment was not mandatory and when the consultation committee produced a unanimous and positive opinion in the presence of the representative of the authority for urban planning.

If under such circumstances the opinion was unanimous and negative, this has a binding effect and hence the license will be refused by the City Council.

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

In which cases will a meeting of the consultation committee be organised?

The Council of Mayor and Aldermen does not have the right to decide if and when it will organise a consultation committee for a particular project. The Brussels Code for Town Planning (CoBAT /BWRO) and the implementation decrees lay down for which projects and plans a public inquiry with the consultation committee needs to be organised. The CoBAT/BWRO also sets out that the consultation committee is to give an opinion within 30 calendar days after the conclusion of the public inquiry.

Most communes publish the dates and the agenda of the next consultation committee on their website. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

What is the procedure of a consultation committee?

The meeting of the consultation committee follows a fixed plan.

Public part: the public hearing

A recent implementation decree (May 2014) lays down which issues need to be addressed during the public part of the consultation committee.

  • presentation of the project by the applicant
  • explanation by the permit-issuing authority of the motivation for the public inquiry and the opinions delivered by other authorities.
  • remarks and objections by those who have requested to be present / state their remarks
  • possible remarks and questions by the permit-issuing authority and other members of the consultation committee.
  • right of reply by the applicant

Non-public part: the consultation meeting 

The members of the consultation committee deliberate behind closed doors about the opinion that they are going to issue, without the presence of the applicant or the residents. In other words, the consultation takes place between the various advisory services and it is not a real consultation with the residents. A quorum of 4 members of the consultation committee is required to issue a valid opinion. The opinion of the consultation committee needs to be a reasoned opinion, but it has no binding effect.

The consultation committee usually issues its opinion immediately after the hearing. For plans and large complex files, time pressure may cause the consultation committee to put off issuing its opinion to a later meeting. Moreover, each member is entitled to ask for a postponement. The member will need to give grounds for his request and the other members need to accept this request. A good argument is for example that insufficient clear information has been provided in the application files, and that a local inspection is required.

The opinion of the consultation committee is a public document; anyone can obtain a copy of the minutes and the opinion. Some, but certainly not all communes also will publish this information on their website. 

 [/collapse collapsed]

FOLLOW-UP 

[collapse collapsed]

What happens after the consultation committee?

Depending on the decision of the consultation committee, various procedures may be followed. 

In some cases the opinion of the consultation committee is binding (cfr Is the opinion of the consultation committee binding?)

As a general rule, the permit-issuing authority will look at the opinion of the consultation committee as one of the elements in the file.  

In the case of a favourable or negative opinion, the file carries on according to the administrative procedure until the permit issuing authority takes the final decision.

If the consultation committee imposes conditions, again various procedures may be followed.

  • The committee defers its opinion, and asks the applicant to modify his building plan according to the conditions imposed. The modified plan will be submitted again to the committee at a later date.
  • The consultation committee issues a favourable opinion, on conditions. The permit issuing authority may then decide to issue a permit, in which these conditions have been entirely or partly included. The applicant has to ensure that the building work is carried out according to these modifications.
  • Finally, the conditions imposed may be so strict that a new public inquiry needs to be organised for the modified project. This only happens very rarely.

If the consultation committee decides to defer its opinion because of time pressure or insufficient information, the opinion is issued at the next meeting.

If you wish to follow up on the file, you will have to take the required action. The fact that you have appeared during the public inquiry or in front of the consultation committee does not imply that you will be automatically invited to a possible second meeting of the consultation committee. If the consultation committee has imposed important conditions, you should ask the competent official whether a new public inquiry will be held and whether you will be invited to attend.

Depending on the application or the applicant and the location of the project, the municipal or regional authority will issue the town planning permit. Such a town planning permit whether issued or refused, is a public document that is available for consultation at the town planning service of your commune.

After the opinion of the consultation committee has been issued, the opinion of the regional competent official is often required.

But the Council of Mayor and Aldermen can use the opinion of the consultation committee as a permit in its own right, when an impact assessment was not mandatory and when the consultation committee produced a unanimous and positive opinion in the presence of the representative of the authority for urban planning.

If under such circumstances the opinion was unanimous and negative, this has a binding effect and hence the license will be refused by the Council of Mayor and Aldermen.

In all other circumstances the opinion of the consultation committee is not binding and the competent official is not legally bound to follow it. However, in most cases, he or she does follow this opinion. The ensuing opinion of the competent official is binding, which means that the commune is not allowed to be more lenient than the competent official. 

[/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

How do you discover the decision about a file?

All the following documents are public documents and may be consulted at the town hall. 

  • The minutes of the public hearing of the consultation committee and its opinion. This report (very often) includes a summary record of the interventions. You may request a copy from the secretary of the consultation committee.
  • The reasoned opinion of the competent official.
  • The town planning permission that is finally issued or refused.

The fact that you have appeared during the public inquiry or in front of the consultation committee to make remarks or objections, does not mean that you will be automatically informed about additional opinions and decisions. You will need to request these at the town planning service of your commune via phone, e-mail, fax or letter.

There are no fixed terms for the various stages. A time limit has been set from the moment that the complete application file has been submitted and the decision about issuing a permit needs to be taken. However, most communes and even the region do not observe this timing. The minutes and the opinion of the consultation committee are available fairly soon: after the conclusion of the public inquiry, the commune has 30 days to convene the consultation committee and to draw up the minutes of this meeting.

After the town planning permit has been issued, the building work needs to start within 2 years. At the request of the client, this period may be extended by one year. The permit lapses if the building work is halted for one year, or if it does not get started within the fixed term.

 [/collapse collapsed]

[collapse collapsed]

Can you still react against the final decision?

It is possible to react against the final decision by taking legal action and by lodging an appeal.

It is not possible for a local resident or an interest group to lodge a simple appeal against an urban planning permit. Only the applicant (or the commune) can appeal the decision if he/she does not agree with the conditions imposed or with a refusal. In that case, they may lodge an (administrative) appeal with the Brussels government. The ‘Stedenbouwkundige College / Collège d’Urbainsme’ (planning panel) then advises the government in the decision.  You are unable to find out about this as a local resident or person who has requested to be present at the consultation committee . You will not be informed about the arguments for this appeal either.

Local residents or interest groups who want to lodge an appeal against an town planning permit that has been issued,  need to take their case to the State Council. This is a demanding procedure both legally and financially, which can only be introduced on the grounds of procedural failings, and for which you need a lawyer. This possibility of appeal with the State Council allows you to get a legal point across, but we suggest that you only start it on solid legal grounds. Often it takes a long time before a verdict is reached.

[/collapse collapsed]

Ever wonder about the politicians’ reaction to #dieselgate's corporate cheating? Well, on 28 October they decided to relax the norms and let car makers emit between 50% and 110% more in real life than in some artifical lab. This is 50% to 100% more than what is allowed under a law from 2007. But we live in the real world and we're choking to death. 400.000 of us die each year because of air pollution, in Europe alone. This adds up to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases caused by pollution.



On 16 December, European Environment Ministers will gather in Brussels to discuss air quality norms up to 2030. This is the first time since #dieselgate that our respresentatives are having a meeting with air quality on top of the agenda. They will have the opportunity to come back on the technical and opaque decision taken on 28 October to ensure that the law is respected and that our health is protected.



We're going to make sure that they know that this is a life or death question. Just bring your voice, your energy and a transparent plastic bag in front of the Council building (next to rond point Shuman) on wednesday 16 December from 11:30 to 14:00. Let’s ask EU leaders to give us some air.

Photo-opportunity press: 13h-13h30. 

Go to the Facebook-event!

 

Contact:

Jeroen Verhoeven

+32 2 217 56 33 | +32 477 46 31 81

Zaterdagplein 13 Place du Samedi | Bruxelles 1000 Brussel

BRAL a Belgian NGO that aims at making Brussels more sustainable, demonstrated today in front of the European Council’s Justus Lipsius building (rue de la Loi 175, 1040 Brussels), Wednesday 16 from 11.30 a.m. as EU Environment Ministers to discuss air quality norms for 2030. The objective is to stress the urgency of taking strong measures to clean up the air we breathe and to push for stricter air quality limits.

This is the first time since dieselgate that ministers in charge of combating air pollution will meet to discuss solutions. They will have the opportunity to reverse the technical and opaque decision taken on 28 October to ensure that the law is respected and that the health of Europeans is protected.

On 28 October EU governments have agreed on a major weakening of limits for nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from diesel cars, as well as postponed the implementation of new limits for all new cars until 2019. This allows cars to emit 210% more NOx than the EU air pollution standards (Euro 6) until 2020. And from 2021, all new cars will still be allowed to emit 50% more NOx than the Euro 6 limit of 80mg/km, permanently.

Member States will also decide new limits for dangerous air pollutants such as fine particles, NOx and ammonia for the next fifteen years. Documents show that Ministers are planning to significantly water down the limits proposed by the European Commission and they are proposing numerous flexibilities and accounting tricks to make air quality targets easier to hit [1]. They also suggest removing methane from the Directive, due to strong pressure from the intensive farming lobby.

According to a recent study by the European Environment Agency, 72, 000 premature deaths were caused by exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in 2012 in the EU. The inhalation of NO2  causes respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, even lung cancer, as well as prenatal and early childhood abnormalities. Diesel vehicles are the principal source of hazardous NO2 in urban areas throughout Europe.

Footnote: 

[1] Concil document: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15172-2015-INIT/en/pdf

The procedure has barely been changed since 1979

The basic principles of the system have been set out in the Brussels Town Planning Code (CoBAT. / BWRO)[i]. Its modalities have been set down in detail in several implementing decrees. However, the legal provisions of the Regional Land Use Plan (PRAS / GBP) determine in which case the prior advice of the consultation committee is required.

The system was introduced in March 1976 by Paul Van den Boeynants, who was minister of Brussels Affairs at that time, by means of the approval of the draft Regional Land Use Plan[ii]. The Royal Decree provided for the first time that in the case of certain building applications a public inquiry was to be held, which needed to be announced in advance by means of red posters, and in addition, it provided for obligatory advice from a municipal consultation committee.

A major difference compared to the situation today was that only written reactions of the public at large were allowed at the time. Only the representatives of employers and workers could request to make representations to the consultation committee. Legal recognition was required to provide others with the same statute. At present, any resident or user of the town may react, in writing or orally during the public hearing of the consultation committee.

When the Regional Land Use Plan was finally approved three years later, the procedure was amended by means of a new Royal Decree[iii]. That Decree dating from November 1979 is still the foundation for the present system[iv].

The regional development plan of 1979 cornered by large projects

The origin of the system of public inquiries and consultation committees needs to be viewed in reference to the spirit of the time. At that time, urban planning was still a federal matter.  The 1962 act determined the hierarchy of the plans. It was decided that for the 19 municipalities or communes of Brussels only a Land Use development plan would be established. The Regional Land Use Plan for the Brussels-Capital Region (1979) was elaborated under very difficult circumstances and therefore did not include the ambitious objectives that really were highly needed at the time.[v]

The type of Regional Land Use Plan that had been set down in law was suitable for Flanders and Wallonia, but it was not adapted to the very mixed and quickly changing city. Vague zoning indications such as residential, industrial or rural areas for instance were not accurate enough to control office developments.  Brussels developed its own system: instead of establishing zones with one single land use, zones were demarcated with a main land use and a number of secondary land uses that were limited in floor area. After a public inquiry and on condition that the consultation committee gave a positive opinion, these secondary land uses could be allocated a larger floor area under specific conditions.

The draft-Land Use Plan of 1976 was the first plan for Brussels that had an official statute. However, other plans had been elaborated before that time, such as the preliminary study of the draft-Regional Land Use Plan by the Alpha Group [vi] and the plan prepared by the research consultancy Thekné [vii] for the City of Brussels. Although these documents had no legal status and they were never subjected to an organised debate, they did have an impact. The largest demolition projects for Brussels were even inspired by those plans: the continuation of the motorways into the centre, the extreme separation of land uses, the Manhattan Plan for the North Quarter with its demolition and expropriations, the extension of the Justice Palace, the demolition in the neighbourhood of the Marolles, etc

These developments provoked a lot of popular protest; the most important examples of this were the fight by the inhabitants of the North Quarter and the Marolles. Against this background, various local committees and regional organisations like ARAU (Atelier de Recherche et d’Action Urbaines), Bral (Urban Mouvement for Brussels) and IEB (Inter-Environnement Bruxelles) saw the light of day. There was also quite a lot of resistance against those major demolition projects among the young administrations in Brussels.

One of the consequences of the first oil crisis during the mid-seventies was the delay or even scrapping of many of those large projects. Therefore, there was time for reflection. Within that context, the real Regional Development Plan was drawn up, from a clearly defensive and a literally conservative point of view, for the concern of the policymakers to stop or prevent large real estate projects was greater than their willingness to design a true vision of the future for Brussels.

Twofold purpose and two parts

It is important to point out that the purpose of the system of public inquiries and consultation committees is twofold. Most of all, the system is intended to be a planning tool, because the individual evaluation of a building application can control the execution of the proposals submitted. The second ambition is to effect a wider involvement of the local residents in the decision-making. It cannot be denied that the public nature of the policy for granting building permission is enhanced by the organisation of a public inquiry and the associated consultation committee.

The procedure itself can also be divided into two parts. The first part, the public inquiry focuses in particular on the input from the residents. Anyone, resident, commuter or visitor to the area, each association or enterprise is entitled to study the file of the application or the project of the design, without having to demonstrate his direct or indirect interest. Anyone is entitled to express his remarks to the members of the consultation committee, either in writing or orally.

The consultation committee constitutes the second part of the procedure, and it organises the consultation between the various administrations, semi-governmental services and the town council. The committee where the real consultation takes place meets behind closed doors. The public part, which also refers to the ‘consultation committee’, is formally no more than a hearing. Therefore, in contradiction to what its name suggests, the consultation committee is not an ultimate participative device, but a tool for providing information and a hearing.

[i] Art 6 and art 9 of the Brussels’ Town Planning Code (CoBAT /BWRO) decree of 9/4/2004 amended several times

[ii] 22/03/1976 – Royal Decree for the foundation of a consultation committee for local town planning for each commune of the Brussels Capital Region and for the regulation of disclosure in reference to the activities and building work, which are subject to prior consultation according to the provisions of the draft regional plan and the regional plan of the agglomeration of Brussels.

[iii] 05/11/1979 – Royal Decree setting out for the Brussels Capital Region which special rules of public disclosure need to be followed in reference to some applications for building and land development and including the organisation for each commune of the Brussels Capital Region of a consultation committee for local town planning.

[iv] 23/11/1993 – Decree of the Brussels Government for the procedure of public inquiries and the consultation committee

[v] More about the past history and the difficult elaboration of the Brussels Capital Region Development Plan (1979) (special edition of Brallerlei)

[vi] Structure plan Alpha Group 1947, characterised by a clear separation of land uses.

[vii] On behalf of the City of Brussels1962, the Research Consultancy Thekné drew up a plan for the pentagon, with an inner ring road around the historical centre and residential high-rises along approach roads. 

Recup’Kitchen is a project that will give pride of place to food reclamation in association with the Latinis vegetable garden. It will be located on the site of the old Josaphat train station. 



It will focus on local and/or organic products as well as unsold produce from the markets of Brussels. It will offer low-priced dishes (pay what you want with a recommended minimum) prepared in a mobile kitchen. It shows that alternatives for a "different consumption pattern" are possible.

It will also offer a chance to get together on the ground to dream, debate, cook, take a break, build bonds, etc. 

To do this, they need to purchase a caravan and collect the funds needed to convert it, using environmentally-friendly materials, second-hand furniture, etc.



RECUP’KITCHEN will also travel within Brussels to seek out other citizens’ initiatives. 



Interested? Join them! You can help them, offer your skills, donate spare furniture and materials and/or support the project financially. 

 

BRALpublication # 4 gives an overview and analysis of a new genereation of residents’ initiatives.

Het Punt vzw - Steunpunt Vrijwilligerswerk Brussel presents 'Vollenbak Volontaire'

The 5th of December, International Volunteer Day, is dedicated to the numerous initiatives of the inhabitants of Brussels this year. All events, projects and collectives that bring people together and create a sustainable Brussels where we love to live!

Promote your initiative now on this website and on December 5th in Muntpunt.

Obtain free support and assistance for your initiative for one year!

Want to know more?

 

 

 

 

Imagine…

What would you propose for our vibrant community at the Josaphat site (not the park)?

We, as enthusiasts citizens, already created a social community garden, a sustainable kitchen and are building a collective structure to host our activities and workshops. Together we are temporarily using a part of the Josaphat site.

Which great ideas can you offer us to add to these activities?

We would like to open up to more interventions that respect Josaphat as:

- a natural environment,

- a common and integrated place,

- a laboratory, a workshop space,

- a circular and transitory use, and

- a serene and cosy atmosphere.

These ideas can show the richness of our collective creativity. We hope to get inspired. We hope to explore what is possible on this place.

In Brussels, Sint-Lucas (Faculty of Architecture KUL) collaborates with BRAL to test the potential of the Incubators platform.

We hope this tool can support citizen participation in the creation of public spaces.

Imagine…

What would you propose for our vibrant community at the Josaphat site (not the park)?

We, as enthusiasts citizens, already created a social community garden, a sustainable kitchen and are building a collective structure to host our activities and workshops. Together we are temporarily using a part of the Josaphat site.

Which great ideas can you offer us to add to these activities?

We would like to open up to more interventions that respect Josaphat as:

- a natural environment,

- a common and integrated place,

- a laboratory, a workshop space,

- a circular and transitory use, and

- a serene and cosy atmosphere.

These ideas can show the richness of our collective creativity. We hope to get inspired. We hope to explore what is possible on this place.

In Brussels, Sint-Lucas (Faculty of Architecture KUL) collaborates with BRAL to test the potential of the Incubators platform.

We hope this tool can support citizen participation in the creation of public spaces.

At the feet of the Brussels European Parliament, on the other side of rue Vautier, the Wiertz Museum accommodates not only the work of Antoine Wiertz precursor of Belgian surrealism, but also houses the memory of Henry Conscience. The workshop, the house, the stairs, the porter’s house, the patio and the garden: all are intact witnesses of the cultural eclecticism at the time Europe’s nations were developing. Per request of the local residents, confronted with the overwhelming construction site of the Parliament, the whole has been classified on October 23, 1997.

After the European Administration privatized – against their prior promises – the classified swimming pool and theatre of the Résidence Palace nearby the Schuman;

  • when the laborious installation of the House of European History in the old Eastman Institute on the classified site of Parc Léopold made us witness the triumphant return of “façadisme’ in Brussels;
  • at a time we learn about a possible demolition/reconstruction of the parliament’s hemicycle – which is partly situated in the protected zone of the classified site of the Wiertz Museum;
  • at the moment a general reformation of the environmental planning of the region is weakening the protection of patrimony; and that a citizen movement stands up against it;
  • right when security issues are again weighing on the districts we still live in

the Associative Coordination devoting itself to the preservation of Parc Léopold has been informed that the Belgian Federal Public Service of Internal Affairs is preparing to cede the house of the artist and the garden to the European Parliament, at the price of a symbolical Euro. It also learned that one of the studied options plans on emptying the building ‘coté cour’ and raising a “provisional” large reception hall ‘coté jardin’. What pottering awaits us ahead of this?

However, the European Parliament has decided that the year 2018 would be dedicated to the Union’s cultural patrimony, since it’s an effective way to promote European citizenship. Is it reasonable then, to take on attitudes and projects that risk not only to affect the Brussels, Flemish, Belgian and European patrimony, but also to create a new discord with the citizens, starting with those who live closest to the Union’s institutions?

For this reason we ask the European Parliament and the Belgian Federal Government to accept to meet us. Together, we want to develop a project intending to create a better future for the Wiertz Museum, Parc Leopold and their direct surroundings, because the Wiertz Museum and Europe belong to us… as well!

A petition gathering over 4,000 signatures has been put online to make sure we are no longer ignored by the people forgetting that in our district, like in the whole of Europe, the citizens-residents-voters do not accept to be pushed out. We will hand it over to the European Parliament and the Belgian Government at the time of the meeting we’re looking forward to ‘mit brennender Sorge’ (with ardent concern).

Contact FR, IT, DE & EN : Marco Schmitt 0497 122 770 - NL & EN Toha De Brant 02 217 56 33

Farewell urban motorway, so long traffic jams, bye-bye pollution! Let's give back the boulevards of the Petite Ceinture to the people of Brussels again. To all the people of Brussels.

Supported by actors from the Brussels academic world and urban activist groups, Rien van de Wall and Wim Menten, the city planners of BYE BYE Petite Ceinture, bring the debate on the future of the boulevards to the front. Our kick-off event is in the Kaaitheater on 22 September, during the Week of Mobility. We will show what is possible on the Petite Ceinture and will ask prominent Brussels politicians about their view of the boulevards.

Because the new cycle paths on the Petite Ceinture can only be a start. Let's prepare the next step, one in which the boulevards bring neighbourhoods together, get Brussels moving again and raise the quality of living and working in the city centre. A giant leap forward for the capital of Europe!

BYE BYE Petite Ceinture is an initiative of Wim Menten and Rien van de Wall (city planners and authors of PetiteCeinture.be), in cooperation with BRAL, ARAU, Brussels Studies Institute, Brussels Academy, IRIB (Institut de recherches interdisciplinaires sur Bruxelles) and Architecture Workroom Brussels.

Meer info :  byebye.kleinering.be & byebye.petiteceinture.be

Facebookevent :: https://www.facebook.com/events/115453022495271/